Illustrative case study · Healthcare & Life Sciences
Both clinic types want AI scheduling. Independents can sign for it.
The first sales hires for a new AI scheduling tool would follow one choice: sell to hospital-owned clinics first, or to independents. For the health-tech company making it, we delivered a report in 13 days, built on 150 clinic managers who run the daily schedule.
Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.
The engagement
Illustrative scenariodays, with the report, the data file and a live readout.
Managers who run outpatient clinic schedules.
80 hospital-owned and 70 independent clinic managers.
Workflow, readiness, barriers and who signs, by clinic ownership.
A health-tech company
Which clinics to sell its AI scheduling to first
Go-to-market planning, before the first sales hires
AI-moderated interviews on workflow, readiness, barriers and buying
Rebooking load, readiness to adopt, barriers, signing authority
Outpatient clinics across specialties, hospital-owned and independent
Headline figures
rebooking calls at the median clinic in the past week, and 66% rebook mainly by phone
of hospital-owned managers would adopt within a year, against 61% of independents
of independent managers can sign a scheduling contract alone, against 9% in hospital-owned clinics
The question
Which clinics should AI scheduling reach first?
The company had built an AI tool that confirms, cancels and rebooks outpatient visits by text and phone. Hospital-owned clinics looked like the bigger prize and independents like the faster sale. The team needed the managers who run the schedule to say how they work today, how ready they are and who signs.
How do clinics schedule today, and where does front-desk time go?
How ready are managers to let AI book and rebook visits?
What blocks a purchase, and who signs it?
What we did
How the study ran, start to finish.
- 1Kickoff
Hospital-owned or independent first.
Do we sell AI scheduling to hospital-owned clinics first, or to independents? The kickoff turned it into three questions: where front-desk time goes today, how ready managers are to let AI book and rebook visits, and what blocks a purchase and who signs it.
- 2Design
Two clinic types, an adoption map.
Each manager ran the clinic’s daily schedule and had a say in its software: 80 from hospital-owned and 70 from independent clinics. Questions moved from current workflow to readiness, barriers and who signs, starting with a count of last week’s rebooking calls.
- 3Fielding
150 managers on how they schedule.
Managers took a median 27 minutes by voice or text, quant and qual in one conversation; every barrier drew a follow-up on who signs. The researcher read all 172 and removed 22 for off-target experience, rushed responses or duplicates, keeping 150.
- 4Analysis
Hospital clinics are ready; few can sign.
The researcher weighed readiness against signing authority, and the two clinic types split. Hospital-owned managers were as ready to adopt, 66% against 61%, but only 9% could sign a contract themselves, against 73% of independents.
- 5Readout
A $15,000 median signing limit.
The researcher showed the map of who signs at each clinic type to the product team during a live readout, beside a 31-page report on readiness and barriers and the full data file. The first plan is now priced under the median independent signing limit.
What we found
Four findings from the report.
Clinic managers rebook by phone, a median 41 calls in the past week. Readiness is high in both clinic types: hospital-owned managers want AI scheduling as much as independents do. Signing authority separates them: most independent managers sign alone, up to a median $15,000 a year, while most hospital-owned clinics send the decision to health-system IT.
Rebooking runs on the phone and fills the front desk.
66% rebook canceled visits mainly by phone, and managers counted a median 41 rebooking calls in the past week. Only 7% let patients rebook themselves online.
Scheduling practices · multi-select · n = 150Hospital-owned managers are as ready as independents.
66% of hospital-owned managers and 61% of independents would adopt AI scheduling within a year, a gap that is not statistically significant at these sample sizes. Rebooking canceled visits is the first job they would hand over.
Independent managers sign; hospital clinics wait on IT.
73% of independent managers can sign a scheduling contract themselves, against 9% of hospital-owned managers. For 59% of hospital-owned managers the decision sits with health-system IT. Independent signers approve up to a median $15,000 a year.
Linking to the practice system is the first barrier.
49% name linking to their current practice management system as a barrier, ahead of patients who prefer to call (39%) and front-desk pushback (27%). Data privacy review weighs most in hospital-owned clinics.
Barriers to adopting AI scheduling · multi-select · n = 150“I could sign for this tomorrow if it fits my budget line. Anything bigger goes to the owners and waits a quarter.”Clinic manager · Illustrative quote
Illustrative quotes
Three themes behind the numbers.
“Monday mornings my front desk does nothing but call back last week’s cancellations. Nobody gets checked in on time until noon.”
“I would love this. Software goes through system IT, though, and their list is longer than my waiting room.”
“Unless it writes back into our practice system, my staff key everything twice. That’s where these tools die.”
What the health-tech company did
Three moves made with the report.
Priced the first plan under the signing limit.
An annual plan sits under the $15,000 median signing limit, so most independent managers who sign alone can buy it without another approval.
Sold to independent clinics first.
Readiness held across ownership, so the first sales hires went where the manager who wants the tool also signs.
Built the practice system link first.
Two-way sync with the most common practice management systems, the barrier 49% named, moved to the top of the roadmap.
Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.
Bring us your next adoption question.
A senior researcher designs and presents every study.
Talk to our teamMore healthcare & life sciences studies