UserCue
Private EquityHealthcare & Life SciencesInsightsContact
Talk to our team
UserCue
Private EquityHealthcare & Life SciencesInsightsContact
Talk to our team
Newsletter

Stay up to date with UserCue

Case studies, product updates, and findings from our research.

By subscribing, you agree to receive UserCue research notes and product updates. Unsubscribe anytime.

UserCue

Primary research for high-trust industries.

Expert-led. AI-native.

Research for
Private EquityHealthcare & Life Sciences
Insights
Case studies
Company
ContactLinkedInPrivacyTerms
© 2026 UserCue. All rights reserved.
Insights / Case studies / Healthcare & Life Sciences

Illustrative case study · Healthcare & Life Sciences

A device both sides accept, and a setup nobody owns.

Setup for a home-use device could be built for the patient, the family caregiver or both, and the maker had to choose before launch. It also needed to know whether patients would accept the device and what worries each side. We interviewed 250 adults: 100 patients and 150 family caregivers; the report took 12 days.

Illustrative scenario
Samplen = 250

Illustrative report

Home Medical Device Experience

Will patients accept the device at home, and should setup be built for them or for the family member who helps?

Study architecture

01
Gauge acceptanceWould each group accept the device for home use
02
Index the worriesNine concerns, indexed to the top one
03
Match the pairsPatients and their own family member, interviewed apart

Scope

A patient and a family member can each accept a device and still expect the other one to set it up.

Sample

250

Adults who would use the device and the unpaid family members who help them.

Research by UserCue
Study typeAcceptance study
ScenarioIllustrative
Home device acceptance · Executive reportExecutive summary

Executive summary

Both groups accept the device, and in most paired homes each expects the other to set it up

Four in five of the 250 adults, 100 patients and 150 unpaid family caregivers, find the device acceptable for home use, caregivers more than patients. Their worries differ: patients put how it looks and sounds first, caregivers setup. In 60 matched households, interviewed apart, 37 pairs each named the other as the person who would set it up.

79%n = 250
find the device acceptable for home use
84%n = 150
of caregivers find it acceptable
71%n = 100
of patients find it acceptable
37of 60 homes
where patient and caregiver each named the other

Figures rounded. Base n = 250 adults unless stated.

Top lines

1Both groups accept the device, caregivers more than patientsAcceptance by group03
2Patients worry most about how the device looks and sounds at homePatient concern index04
3Caregivers worry most about setting the device up correctlyCaregiver concern index05
4In matched households, each side expects the other to set it upPaired-home comparison06
5Sample, screener and quality controlWho we interviewed and how07
AAppendixQuestion flow and data tables09

Sample

250 adults

Segments

100 patients, 150 caregivers

Method

AI-moderated interviews, nine-concern index

Pairs

60 households, interviewed apart

Illustrative report. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional.

Illustrative report02
Illustrative reportExecutive summary

Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.

The engagement

Illustrative scenario
Delivered in
12

days, with the report, the data file and a live readout.

Interviews
250

Adults who would use the device and family members who help them.

Audiences
2

100 patients and 150 family caregivers, including 60 matched pairs.

Method
Index

Nine concerns indexed, with 60 households interviewed apart.

The brief
Client

A medical device maker

Decision

Who to build setup and onboarding for

Stage

Before the launch of a home-use device

How we ran it
Approach

AI-moderated interviews with matched household pairs

Measured

Acceptance, nine concerns, who would handle setup

Sample

Adult patients and unpaid family caregivers

Headline figures

Acceptance79%

of patients and caregivers find the device acceptable for home use

Setup37 of 60

matched households where patient and caregiver each named the other to set it up

Patients71%

of patients find the device acceptable, against 84% of caregivers

The question

Will patients accept the device, and who should own setup at home?

The device sits in the home and is used daily by an adult patient, often with help from a family member. The device team needed to know how each group sees it, what worries each most, and whether setup and onboarding should be built for the patient, the helper or both.

1

How acceptable is the device to patients and to caregivers?

2

What worries each group most about using it at home?

3

Where do patients and caregivers see it differently?

What we did

How the study ran, start to finish.

  1. 1Kickoff

    Setup for the patient, or the family.

    Will patients accept this device at home, and should we build setup for them or for the family member who helps? The kickoff turned it into three questions: acceptance in each group, the top worries of each, and where the two disagree.

  2. 2Design

    Matched pairs, nine concerns.

    The screener admitted adult users and the unpaid family members who help them: 100 patients and 150 caregivers, some recruited as pairs from one home. Pairs were interviewed apart so neither shaped the other’s responses, and nine concerns were indexed to the biggest one.

  3. 3Fielding

    250 adults, every worry traced.

    Every respondent took part by voice or text, quant and qual in one conversation, a 33-minute median, and each worry was traced to who handles it at home. The researcher read all 287 and removed 37 for duplicate household entries or paid aides, leaving 250.

  4. 4Analysis

    Each side expects the other to set it up.

    The researcher matched each patient’s responses to their own caregiver’s in the 60 paired homes to see who each expects to do setup. In 37 of 60 homes, each named the other; caregivers ranked setup their top concern, patients ranked it sixth of nine.

  5. 5Readout

    Nobody owned setup in 37 of 60 homes.

    The researcher talked the device team through a 27-page report in a live readout: acceptance, both concern indexes, the paired-home comparison and the full data file. Setup became one guided session for patient and caregiver together, with a quick-start guide written for both.

What we found

Four findings from the report.

Summary

Both groups accept the device, caregivers more than patients. Their worries differ: patients worry most about how it looks and sounds in the home, caregivers about setting it up correctly. In matched households the gap becomes a plan with no owner: in 37 of 60, patient and caregiver each expect the other to do the setup.

Home device acceptance · Executive reportTop line 1
1

Top line 1 of 4

Both groups accept the device, caregivers more than patients

1 Q4. How acceptable would this device be for use in your home? Five-point scale, n = 250.

2 Caregivers were asked about the home of the person they help.

Acceptance is broad. 79% find the device acceptable for home use, 84% of caregivers and 71% of patients1. Few reject it outright: 7% of patients and 4% of caregivers. Patients who hesitate talk more about the device in their living space than about using it. Caregivers who share the patient’s home accept it most, at 87%.

79%n = 250
find the device acceptable for home use
84%n = 150
of caregivers find it acceptable
71%n = 100
of patients find it acceptable
7%n = 100
of patients find it unacceptable

Acceptance of the device for home use

Acceptable for home use, top-two box

50100All adultsn = 25079%Caregiversn = 15084%Patientsn = 10071%Caregivers in the same homen = 8387%Caregivers living elsewheren = 6781%

Patients (n = 100)

Acceptance71%22%
AcceptableUnsureUnacceptable

Caregivers (n = 150)

Acceptance84%12%
AcceptableUnsureUnacceptable

Five-point scale; top-two box = very or somewhat acceptable. Rated after photos and a short video of the device in a home. Shares are rounded. Base n = 250 adults, 100 patients and 150 caregivers.

Supporting evidence

  • Patients who hesitate describe the device as a reminder of being unwell, sitting in the living room. § 3.2
  • Caregivers who are unsure ask most about how much of their own time the device will take. § 3.32
Illustrative report03
Home device acceptance · Executive reportTop line 2
2

Top line 2 of 4

Patients worry most about how the device looks and sounds at home

1 Q5. How much would each of these worry you about using the device at home? Nine items, n = 100.

Patients rated the same nine concerns as caregivers. How the device looks and sounds in the home scores 100, ahead of who sees the data at 741. Fitting it into the daily routine follows at 58. Setting it up correctly ranks sixth of nine for patients, at 36, and in the matched pairs 83% of patients named their caregiver to do it.

100index
how it looks and sounds, the top patient concern
74index
who sees the data
58index
fitting it into the daily routine
36index
setting it up correctly, sixth of nine

Patient concerns, indexed to the top concern

Patient concern index (n = 100)

50100How it looks and sounds in the home100Who sees the data74Fitting it into the daily routine58Cleaning and upkeep47Charging and power41Setting it up correctly36Cost to me26

Top three, patients (n = 100)

  1. 1How it looks and sounds
  2. 2Who sees the data
  3. 3Fitting the daily routine

Where the device would sit (n = 100)

Room in the home47%39%14%
Living roomBedroomKitchen or other

Each concern rated for how much it worries the respondent, rescaled so the top concern = 100; scores are relative and do not sum to 100. Nine concerns, the top seven shown.

Supporting evidence

  • Patients who live alone rate the data concern higher than those who live with family. § 4.2
  • Most patients would keep the device in the living room or a bedroom; few would put it anywhere else. § 4.3
Illustrative report04
Home device acceptance · Executive reportTop line 3
3

Top line 3 of 4

Caregivers worry most about setting the device up correctly

1 Q5. How much would each of these worry you about the device being used at home? Nine items, n = 150.

For caregivers the order turns over. Setting it up correctly scores 100 and fitting it into the daily routine 691. Knowing whom to call with a question comes third at 55. How the device looks and sounds, the patients’ top concern, ranks seventh for caregivers at 29.

100index
setting it up correctly, the top caregiver concern
69index
fitting it into the daily routine
55index
knowing whom to call with a question
29index
how it looks and sounds, seventh

Caregiver concerns, indexed to the top concern

Caregiver concern index (n = 150)

50100Setting it up correctly100Fitting it into the daily routine69Knowing whom to call with a question55Who sees the data48Cleaning and upkeep40Charging and power34How it looks and sounds in the home29

Top three, caregivers (n = 150)

  1. 1Setting it up correctly
  2. 2Fitting the daily routine
  3. 3Whom to call with a question

Where caregivers live (n = 150)

Household55%33%12%
Same homeNearbyFarther away

Rescaled so the top concern = 100; scores are relative and do not sum to 100. Caregivers rated the same nine concerns as patients.

Supporting evidence

  • Who sees the data, second for patients, ranks only fourth for caregivers. § 5.2
  • Caregivers who have set up another home device before still rank setup first. § 5.3
Illustrative report05
Home device acceptance · Executive reportTop line 4
4

Top line 4 of 4

In matched households, each side expects the other to set it up

1 Q9. Who in your household would set up the device when it arrives? Asked of both members of each pair, 60 households.

2 Top-three ranking of the nine concerns from Q5, all 250 adults.

A patient and their own caregiver were interviewed apart in 60 homes. In 37 of the 60, each named the other as the person who would set the device up1. Only 18 agreed on who would do it, 13 on the caregiver and 5 on the patient, and in 5 each named themselves. Patients lean on family: 83% of the patients in these pairs named their caregiver.

37of 60 homes
where each named the other
18of 60 homes
agreed on who would set it up
63%n = 150
of caregivers rank setup in their top three
12%n = 100
of patients rank setup in their top three

Who each side expects to set the device up, 60 matched households

Matched households by setup plan, share of 60

50100Each named the other62%Agreed on the caregiver22%Agreed on the patient8%Each named themselves8%

Whom patients in the 60 pairs named for setup

The patient’s pick83%17%
Their caregiverThemselves

Rank setup in their top three concerns

All adults (n = 250)43%Caregivers (n = 150)63%Patients (n = 100)12%

Matched households: a patient and the caregiver who helps them, interviewed separately on the same questions; neither saw the other’s responses. Shares of 60 households are rounded.

Supporting evidence

  • Where each named the other, most describe the other as better with technology, and few had talked about setup at home. § 6.2
  • Many households that agreed on the caregiver still asked for a first call with both of them present, to split the steps. § 6.3
Illustrative report06
Top line 1 of 4 · page 03Illustrative report · top line 1 of 4 · swipeIllustrative report
1
Question 1 · Acceptance

Both groups accept the device, caregivers more than patients.

79% find the device acceptable for home use: 84% of the 150 caregivers and 71% of the 100 patients. Patients who hesitate talk about how the device would change their home more often than about how it works.

Caregivers84%
All adults79%
Patients71%
Acceptable for home use, top-two box · n = 250
2
Question 2 · Patients’ worries

Patients worry most about how the device looks and sounds at home.

Indexed to the top concern, how the device looks and sounds in the home scored 100 and who sees the data 74. Setting it up correctly ranked sixth of nine for patients, at 36.

Looks and sounds at home100
Who sees the data74
Fitting the daily routine58
Correct setup (sixth)36
Patient concern index, indexed to 100 · n = 100
3
Question 2 · Caregivers’ worries

Caregivers worry most about setting the device up correctly.

For caregivers the order turns over: setting it up correctly scored 100 and fitting it into the daily routine 69. How the device looks and sounds, the patients’ top concern, ranked seventh for caregivers.

Setting it up correctly100
Fitting the daily routine69
Whom to call with a question55
Looks and sounds (seventh)29
Caregiver concern index, indexed to 100 · n = 150
4
Question 3 · The pairs

In matched households, each side expects the other to set it up.

Matching each patient’s responses with their own caregiver’s showed the gap. In 37 of the 60 paired homes, each named the other as the person who would set the device up. Only 18 households agreed on who would do it.

37 of 60named each other
18 of 60agreed on one person
Who would set the device up · 60 matched households
“My daughter is better with these things, so I’d leave the setup to her. I’ve never actually asked her.”
Patient · Illustrative quote

Illustrative quotes

Three themes behind the numbers.

In the home
“What would bother me is it humming on the dresser all night and making my bedroom look like a hospital.”
Patient
Setup
“Getting it set up right is the part I worry about. I want someone on the phone with me the first time.”
Family caregiver
Who does it
“My father thinks I’m doing the setup. I’d assumed he wanted to do it himself.”
Family caregiver

What the device maker did

Three moves made with the report.

1The setup · from finding 4

Made setup one guided session for both.

Every new home books one guided setup session with the patient and the caregiver together, so setup has an owner before the device arrives.

2The guide · from finding 3

Rewrote the quick-start guide for two readers.

The guide now names who does each step and opens with the setup checks caregivers ranked as their top concern.

3The design · from finding 2

Put a quieter, smaller unit on the roadmap.

How the device looks and sounds, the patients’ top concern, became a design target for the next version.

Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.

Bring us your next device launch question.

A senior researcher designs and presents every study.

Talk to our team

More healthcare & life sciences studies

Market assessment

Dental Equipment Buyer Segmentation

Owners and managers who buy equipment for dental clinics
Choice-based conjoint

Hospital Infusion Pump Choice

Nursing and biomedical leaders who choose hospital pumps
Feature prioritization

Operating Room Scheduling Tools Concept Test

Surgeons and administrators who run the operating room