Illustrative case study · Healthcare & Life Sciences
The OR’s two sides split on tools, except for one.
Surgeons with block time and the administrators who run the operating room schedule both have a say in its software. A medtech company had eight scheduling concepts and budget to build one first, so we interviewed 200 surgeons and administrators. It took 12 days to deliver the report.
Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.
The engagement
Illustrative scenariodays, with the report, the data file and a live readout.
Surgeons and administrators who run the operating room.
110 surgeons and 90 OR administrators.
Each side ranked all eight concepts, then guessed the other side’s pick.
A medtech company
Which of eight OR scheduling concepts to build first
Product planning, before next year’s build
AI-moderated interviews with a ranked test of eight concepts
Concept ranking, adoption timing, each side’s guess of the other
Surgeons with weekly block time and OR administrators
Headline figures
of surgeons rank a self-scheduling app first
of administrators rank automatic release of unused block time first
rank case duration prediction in their top three, the only concept on both groups’ lists
The question
Which of eight operating room tools should be built first?
Eight concepts were on the table, from a self-scheduling app for surgeons to automatic release of unused block time, and the budget covered one build. Surgeons shape whether a tool gets used; administrators shape whether it gets bought.
Which of the eight concepts do surgeons and administrators rank highest?
How soon would hospitals adopt the leading concepts?
Where do the two groups disagree?
What we did
How the study ran, start to finish.
- 1Kickoff
Eight concepts, budget for one.
Which of our eight OR scheduling concepts should we build first? The kickoff turned it into three questions: what surgeons and administrators rank highest, how soon hospitals would adopt each favorite, and where the two groups part ways.
- 2Design
Two OR roles, eight concepts ranked.
The screener took surgeons who hold weekly block time and administrators who run the OR schedule or its budget: 110 surgeons, 90 administrators. Each respondent ranked all eight concepts, then guessed which concept the other group would put first.
- 3Fielding
200 OR leaders, in their own words.
Both groups chose voice or text, quant and qual together, median 32 minutes; a follow-up asked what would stop each top pick in their own OR. The researcher read all 238 and removed 38 for contradictions and surgeons without block time, leaving 200.
- 4Analysis
One concept made both top-three lists.
The researcher set the surgeons’ and administrators’ rankings side by side: their favorites differ, a self-scheduling app against automatic release of unused block time. Only case duration prediction sits in both top threes, for 58% of surgeons and 71% of administrators.
- 5Readout
Duration prediction is top three for 64%.
The researcher opened the product team’s live readout with each side’s guess of the other’s favorite, then every concept’s rank by role and the adoption timing, in a 38-page report with the full data file. Next year’s build now starts with case duration prediction.
What we found
Four findings from the report.
Surgeons and administrators want different things: surgeons pick a self-scheduling app, administrators pick automatic release of unused block time. Case duration prediction is the one concept in both groups’ top three, for 64% of respondents. Each side misreads the other: only 23% of administrators guessed the surgeons’ favorite.
Each group puts a different concept first.
41% of surgeons rank a self-scheduling app first, and 38% of administrators rank automatic release of unused block time first. Neither group puts the other’s favorite in its own top three.
Case duration prediction is the one shared pick.
Case duration prediction sits in the top three for 58% of surgeons and 71% of administrators, 64% overall. It is the only concept in both groups’ top three.
Ranked in the top three of eight · n = 200Administrators would adopt duration prediction soonest.
50% of administrators expect their hospital to adopt case duration prediction within a year, ahead of block release (41%) and the self-scheduling app (18%). Block release waits on a change to block policy.
Administrators expecting adoption within a year · n = 90Each side misreads what the other wants.
Only 23% of administrators guessed that surgeons would put the self-scheduling app first; most guessed block release, their own favorite. Surgeons did better: 38% guessed the administrators’ first choice.
“Tell me how long the case before mine will actually run, and I can plan my day. That helps me and the front office at the same time.”Surgeon · Illustrative quote
Illustrative quotes
Three themes behind the numbers.
“I want to book my own cases from my phone the way I book a flight. Calling the scheduler three times is how I lose a morning.”
“Every unused block that sits empty until the day before is a room I pay to staff and can’t fill.”
“Better case length estimates help everyone. Surgeons stop running late, and I stop paying overtime for it.”
What the medtech company did
Three moves made with the report.
Led next year’s build with duration prediction.
The one concept in both groups’ top three, for 64% of respondents, now leads the build, ahead of either group’s own favorite.
Planned the launch around administrators’ timing.
With half of administrators expecting adoption within a year, the first release targets hospitals planning OR software spend in the coming budget.
Showed each side the other’s ranking.
Each sales deck shows administrators what surgeons ranked first, and surgeons what administrators did, since most on each side guessed wrong.
Illustrative example. The company, scenario, and all figures are fictional. They show UserCue’s method and deliverable format. They do not come from any client study.
Bring us your next product question.
A senior researcher designs and presents every study.
Talk to our teamMore healthcare & life sciences studies